Critical Review of Lionheart’s Genevieve Nnaji’s Film Using Four Analytical Lenses
23BE033067
Introduction
Genevieve Nnaji’s Lionheart is a significant film in the Nollywood
industry , not just because it marked Netflix’s first original Nollywood
acquisition, but also due to its subtle challenge of traditional gender roles,
business ethics, and family values. Set in Nigeria’s Eastern region, the film revolves
around Adaeze Obiagu, a woman working to
prove her capabilities in her father’s transport company after he falls ill.
This review examines the film through Formal Media Analysis, Oppositional Gaze
(bell hooks), Male Gaze (Laura Mulvey), and Marxist Critique. These lenses
uncover how Lionheart constructs meaning around power, class, gender, and
cultural identity while maintaining its captivating story.
Section A – Formal Media Analysis
Cinematography
The cinematography in Lionheart is
clean, composed, and organized. The camera work avoids exaggerated angles or
movement, reflecting the calm and mature tone of the film. Wide shots are used
effectively to showcase the busy Enugu streets, giving us a sense of real-life
Nigeria. boardrooms are shot with balance
and simplicity, conveying a sense of control and seriousness. and control.
Adaeze is often centered in close up shots, especially during tense business
scenes, suggesting her importance and confidence "Lionheart" uses
natural and warm lighting, creating a light and optimistic mood that
complements the film's themes of family, business, and Nigerian culture,the
overall visual style shows a bright and inviting atmosphere, reflecting
the positive and hopeful narrative.
Mise en Scène
Every detail in the mise en scene costumes,
props, locations, and even color choices demonstrates the blending of modern
Nigeria with traditional values. Adaeze’s outfits are modest and professional,
often blending native prints with Western cuts, symbolizing her balance between
tradition and modernity. The Lionheart office features company branding and
glass walls, symbolizing transparency and ambition. In contrast, her father’s
home is filled with cultural symbols and traditional Igbo decor, grounding a deeper connection to the Nigerian culture.
Sound Design
The film makes subtle use of sound. The background music is gentle and uplifting, often using traditional Nigerian music instruments. In some scenes, silence is used to emphasize emotional weight like when Adaeze is overwhelmed with responsibility. Dialogue is clear and natural, without being overly dramatic. The mix of English and Igbo adds to the authenticity of the environment, connecting language to identity.
Editing
The editing of Lionheart is straightforward. Transitions are smooth, and
scenes are allowed to breathe without being rushed. There are no rapid cuts or rapid
montages; instead, the rhythm is taken at a slow pace to allow the audience grow attached to the characters.
This choice reflects the film’s theme. real progress takes patience, not shortcuts.
Performance
Genevieve Nnaji as Adaeze delivers
a reserved but strong performance. Her expressions, especially in scenes where
she’s confronted seems realistic, it shows her quiet frustration and inner
strength. Nkem Owoh as Uncle Godswill adds humor without reducing the story to
comedy. The acting across the board feels real with no exaggeration, characters
behave like people we know, not caricatures.
Narrative Structure
The film has a three-act storyline :
Exposition (the father’s illness), confrontation (business challenges and
sabotage), and resolution (Adaeze’s negotiation and success). The story is strongly
written and avoids unnecessary subplots. Interestingly, the conflict is not
driven by violence or revenge but by economic pressure and gender expectations making
the narrative feel more mature and relatable.
Section B – Oppositional Gaze (bell
hooks)
Bell hooks’ theory of the Oppositional Gaze shows
how Black women are often silenced or misrepresented in film. Lionheart
actively resists this by placing Adaeze
at the center not as a love interest or side character, but as the main driver
of the story. She is intelligent, capable, and composed. She looks back literally
as well as metaphorically. Her gaze is not submissive she meets the stares of
her male counterparts eye to eye , challenging their doubts with reason and confidence. Unlike many Nollywood films that
rely on melodrama or extreme -femininity,
Lionheart allows Adaeze to be complex. She doesn’t “fight like a man,” nor is
she presented as a victim. Instead, she succeeds by using her voice, ideas, and
emotional maturity. This is a rare portrayal of Black womanhood that doesn’t
exaggerate or romanticize. For viewers familiar with hooks’ theory, Adaeze is a
taking back of narrative in the society that women cant be leaders in the corporate world.
Section C – The Male Gaze (Laura
Mulvey)
Laura Mulvey’s concept of the Male
Gaze critiques how women in film are often framed to satisfy male visual
pleasure. In Lionheart, this gaze is notably absent. Adaeze is never
sexualized. Her clothing is elegant but practical. The camera never lingers on
her body in a suggestive way, and there are no romantic subplots that exist to
validate her femininity.
This lack of sexual objectification
is especially important in a film industry where female characters are often
dressed or filmed to attract attention. Adaeze’s beauty comes from her
intelligence, not her appearance. She is not reduced to a symbol of desire, but
rather seen as a complete character someone with purpose, flaws, and goals.
Mulvey also discusses how women in
film are often passive, waiting to be acted upon. In Lionheart, Adaeze is the
one taking action whether it’s confronting corrupt partners or brainstorming
business solutions. That said, we should
acknowledge that while Adaeze avoids being sexualized, her leadership is still
challenged by the men around her. They don’t see her as incapable because she’s
a woman they just don’t expect her to lead. This reveals how even when
objectification is avoided, (men) doubt still lingers.
Section D – Marxist Critique
A Marxist reading of Lionheart
focuses on how the film portrays class, power, and economic struggle. Essentialy,
the film is about saving a family-owned company from being swallowed by corrupt
business practices and competition. Adaeze is not fighting for luxury she’s
fighting for legacy, integrity, and workers’ livelihoods.
The film doesn’t glorify wealth. Instead
it is quietly criticized. The wealthy businessman Chief Otuekong is shown using
money to manipulate systems, while the Obiagu family relies on honesty and
community trust. There’s also a huge contrast
between the elite corporate players and the ordinary workers of the transport
company, though the film doesn’t dwell on this class war.
Interestingly, the workers
themselves are not given much screen time or voice. The focus stays on the
managerial class. Adaeze, her uncle, and her father. From a Marxist angle, this
could be seen as strengthening capitalist values by keeping the spotlight on
on leadership and ownership of labour. The company’s problems are solved at the top,
not from collective worker action. Still, the film promotes a kind of “humane
capitalism” where ethical leadership and family values win over corruption. It
supports the idea that business can be done with dignity, which is a hopeful
but somewhat idealistic message.
Conclusion
In Conclusion, Lionheart delivers a
story that feels both fresh and familiar. It gently challenges stereotypes
without being confrontational, making it effective, By applying Formal Media
Analysis, we understand how its visual language supports its message. Through
Oppositional Gaze, we recognize Adaeze as a rare and empowering representation
of Black womanhood. Through The Male Gaze, we see how the film resists objectification
and presents women as powerful agents. And with Marxist
Critique, it is discussing the power dynamics of the film, capitalism and
class.
Comments
Post a Comment